Professional Conference Satisfaction Survey - Forensic Evaluation Service Center

Thank you for attending the training. Please complete this satisfaction survey, a requirement of the continuing education granting bodies. Your comments will be combined with that of everyone who offers feedback and shared with everyone involved in the process, including any accrediting bodies, the presenters, sponsors, and planning committee.

I attended the following conference: *

Satisfaction with the Training Production

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The program materials, etc. were available and easily accessible.	Strongly AgreeThe program materials, etc. were available and easily accessible. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe program materials, etc. were available and easily accessible. Agree	NeutralThe program materials, etc. were available and easily accessible. Neutral	DisagreeThe program materials, etc. were available and easily accessible. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe program materials, etc. were available and easily accessible. Strongly Disagree
My accessibility to materials and the presentation were fully accommodated.	Strongly AgreeMy accessibility to materials and the presentation were fully accommodated. Strongly Agree	AgreeMy accessibility to materials and the presentation were fully accommodated. Agree	NeutralMy accessibility to materials and the presentation were fully accommodated. Neutral	DisagreeMy accessibility to materials and the presentation were fully accommodated. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeMy accessibility to materials and the presentation were fully accommodated. Strongly Disagree
The program materials (agenda, handouts, reference materials) were valuable to my experience.	Strongly AgreeThe program materials (agenda, handouts, reference materials) were valuable to my experience. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe program materials (agenda, handouts, reference materials) were valuable to my experience. Agree	NeutralThe program materials (agenda, handouts, reference materials) were valuable to my experience. Neutral	DisagreeThe program materials (agenda, handouts, reference materials) were valuable to my experience. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe program materials (agenda, handouts, reference materials) were valuable to my experience. Strongly Disagree
The facilities (video format, subtitles, etc.) was helpful to my learning experience.	Strongly AgreeThe facilities (video format, subtitles, etc.) was helpful to my learning experience. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe facilities (video format, subtitles, etc.) was helpful to my learning experience. Agree	NeutralThe facilities (video format, subtitles, etc.) was helpful to my learning experience. Neutral	DisagreeThe facilities (video format, subtitles, etc.) was helpful to my learning experience. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe facilities (video format, subtitles, etc.) was helpful to my learning experience. Strongly Disagree
I perceived NO commercial bias from either presenter in this presentation.	Strongly AgreeI perceived NO commercial bias from either presenter in this presentation. Strongly Agree	AgreeI perceived NO commercial bias from either presenter in this presentation. Agree	NeutralI perceived NO commercial bias from either presenter in this presentation. Neutral	DisagreeI perceived NO commercial bias from either presenter in this presentation. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI perceived NO commercial bias from either presenter in this presentation. Strongly Disagree

Meeting the Objectives

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I now have an increased awareness of Ohio's behavioral healthcare system related to requesting increased privileges for NGRI acquittees and ISTU-CJ defendants.	Strongly AgreeI now have an increased awareness of Ohio's behavioral healthcare system related to requesting increased privileges for NGRI acquittees and ISTU-CJ defendants. Strongly Agree	AgreeI now have an increased awareness of Ohio's behavioral healthcare system related to requesting increased privileges for NGRI acquittees and ISTU-CJ defendants. Agree	NeutralI now have an increased awareness of Ohio's behavioral healthcare system related to requesting increased privileges for NGRI acquittees and ISTU-CJ defendants. Neutral	DisagreeI now have an increased awareness of Ohio's behavioral healthcare system related to requesting increased privileges for NGRI acquittees and ISTU-CJ defendants. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI now have an increased awareness of Ohio's behavioral healthcare system related to requesting increased privileges for NGRI acquittees and ISTU-CJ defendants. Strongly Disagree
I can identify relevant factors to include in second opinion (285) 2945.401 evaluations for Ohio's courts.	Strongly AgreeI can identify relevant factors to include in second opinion (285) 2945.401 evaluations for Ohio's courts. Strongly Agree	AgreeI can identify relevant factors to include in second opinion (285) 2945.401 evaluations for Ohio's courts. Agree	NeutralI can identify relevant factors to include in second opinion (285) 2945.401 evaluations for Ohio's courts. Neutral	DisagreeI can identify relevant factors to include in second opinion (285) 2945.401 evaluations for Ohio's courts. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI can identify relevant factors to include in second opinion (285) 2945.401 evaluations for Ohio's courts. Strongly Disagree
I can recognize and explain relevant risk factors when assessing for increased privileges in second opinion (2945.401) evaluations.	Strongly AgreeI can recognize and explain relevant risk factors when assessing for increased privileges in second opinion (2945.401) evaluations. Strongly Agree	AgreeI can recognize and explain relevant risk factors when assessing for increased privileges in second opinion (2945.401) evaluations. Agree	NeutralI can recognize and explain relevant risk factors when assessing for increased privileges in second opinion (2945.401) evaluations. Neutral	DisagreeI can recognize and explain relevant risk factors when assessing for increased privileges in second opinion (2945.401) evaluations. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeI can recognize and explain relevant risk factors when assessing for increased privileges in second opinion (2945.401) evaluations. Strongly Disagree

Rate the Speaker - Dr. Erin Nichting

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Below Expectations
Dr. Nichting's knowledge of the content	ExcellentDr. Nichting's knowledge of the content Excellent	GoodDr. Nichting's knowledge of the content Good	FairDr. Nichting's knowledge of the content Fair	Below ExpectationsDr. Nichting's knowledge of the content Below Expectations
Dr. Nichting's teaching effectiveness	ExcellentDr. Nichting's teaching effectiveness Excellent	GoodDr. Nichting's teaching effectiveness Good	FairDr. Nichting's teaching effectiveness Fair	Below ExpectationsDr. Nichting's teaching effectiveness Below Expectations
Dr. Nichting's method of presentation	ExcellentDr. Nichting's method of presentation Excellent	GoodDr. Nichting's method of presentation Good	FairDr. Nichting's method of presentation Fair	Below ExpectationsDr. Nichting's method of presentation Below Expectations

Rate the Speaker - Dr. Andy Reisner

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Below Expectations
Dr. Reisner's knowledge of the content	ExcellentDr. Reisner's knowledge of the content Excellent	GoodDr. Reisner's knowledge of the content Good	FairDr. Reisner's knowledge of the content Fair	Below ExpectationsDr. Reisner's knowledge of the content Below Expectations
Dr. Reisner's teaching effectiveness	ExcellentDr. Reisner's teaching effectiveness Excellent	GoodDr. Reisner's teaching effectiveness Good	FairDr. Reisner's teaching effectiveness Fair	Below ExpectationsDr. Reisner's teaching effectiveness Below Expectations
Dr. Reisner's method of presentation	ExcellentDr. Reisner's method of presentation Excellent	GoodDr. Reisner's method of presentation Good	FairDr. Reisner's method of presentation Fair	Below ExpectationsDr. Reisner's method of presentation Below Expectations

Please tell us what you thought was most useful in this presentation.

Please tell us what you found least helpful, or unnecessary in this presentation.

We are always looking for topics to provide ongoing professional education. Please make any suggestions here for future topics/speakers or what we could do to provide a better training opportunity for you.

Were there any limitations that prevented you from benefitting from this training?